Scan body and implant soft tissue scans taken with Primescan, i700 and Trios 3

September 28, 2021

We compare how three different intraoral scanners performed when scanning the same implant patient, specifically a scan body and the soft tissue around the implant. In this article, we’re comparing scans taken with CEREC Primescan (Dentsply Sirona), i700 (Medit) and TRIOS 3 (3Shape).

After posting similar comparisons to our social media in the past, the iDD team was asked to show how various IOS capture a scan body and the soft tissue around the implant. Dr Ahmad Al-Hassiny scanned his patient with three different intraoral scanners, these being:

- CEREC Primescan (Dentsply Sirona)

- i700 (Medit)

- TRIOS 3 (3Shape)

We have previously published detailed reviews on each of these intraoral scanners. If you haven't already, check them out by clicking the links above. 

All scans were captured and exported in the highest, uncompressed definition, including the Medit i700, which was set up to scan in HD mode. In this series of pictures below, you will see multiple screenshots with a focus on the scan body and soft tissue, both in color and monochrome as previewed in their native software. 

Below you can also see the exported STL files in a third-party software (Meshmixer by Autodesk), with and without the tessellated mesh.  

Scans imported into a third-party software (Meshmixer by Autodesk).
All scans were exported in their uncompressed, high-definition state.

An additional tip for those using Medit intraoral scanners - when exporting your implant scans you may notice that the Medit scan body scan looks patchy and incomplete. This is a workflow issue as there's a specific way to export such files from the Medit Link software. This is done by simply checking the "Combine Individual Mesh" option in the Export window before exporting the files. You can read the full step-by-step tutorial here.

Here at the Institute of Digital Dentistry we are fortunate to have access to over 15 intraoral scanners. We objectively test and review these scanners to help other dental professionals to form their own opinion. We hope posts like this helps answer some questions you may have and helps you make an informed purchase.

With that being said, if there is anything else you would like us to post, leave a comment below. Which IOS or type of cases would you like to see next? 

About the author 

Olga Kadlecová

Olga is a qualified dental technician from the Czech Republic. Although trained in conventional techniques, she shifted her focus to digital technologies early in her career. Olga has extensive work experience in Europe, New Zealand, Canada, and the USA, which allowed her to master a wide range of dental software and hardware, both laboratory and clinical. Working for iDD, she brings a wealth of information from the perspective of a dental technician.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Read our related CAD/CAM dentistry articles and blogs below:

The Heron IOS by 3DISC is an intraoral scanner that has been around since 2018. Over the years, it has seen improvements to the software and even new branding in an effort to capture some

Read More

In March 2021, Dentsply Sirona introduced CEREC Tessera - a lithium disilicate block that seemingly competes with Ivoclar Vivadent’s IPS e.max CAD. CEREC Tessera promises to be a “trifecta of speed, strength, and

Read More

Check the video below to see what you get with the Heron IOS by 3DISCHere at iDD, we are in the process of testing the Heron IOS, an intraoral scanner that is designed

Read More

The release of the Medit i700 was one of the most anticipated events in digital dentistry this year. Medit released this scanner in April 2021, and the company stayed true to its initial

Read More

Sign up below to receive updates on our next digital dentistry articles and CAD/CAM Reviews!